Video Evidence valid in courts correct or fake? Hashing and Digital Signatures Error Level Analysis Codec Analysis Metadata Analysis File Structure Examination

Posted on December 31, 2023By ERIC FO

CHOICECYCLE CCTV offer the best Video Evidence valid in courts correct or fake? Hashing and Digital Signatures Error Level Analysis Codec Analysis Metadata Analysis File Structure Examination

CCTV video evidence is widely used in courts, but its admissibility and credibility depend on several factors. Courts require video evidence to be authentic, reliable, and relevant to the case. Here’s how various methods are used to determine the validity of CCTV video evidence:

Methods for Validating CCTV Video Evidence

Hashing and Digital Signatures:
- Hashing: This involves generating a unique digital fingerprint (hash) of the video file. If the video is altered, the hash value changes, indicating tampering. Hashing is a common way to verify that the video has not been modified since it was captured.
- Digital Signatures: These provide an additional layer of security by confirming the identity of the sender and ensuring the integrity of the video file. Digital signatures use encryption to create a secure digital seal.
Error Level Analysis (ELA):
- ELA is used to identify areas in a digital image or video that may have been altered. It analyzes the compression levels of different parts of the file. Consistent compression levels suggest authenticity, while inconsistent levels may indicate manipulation.
Codec Analysis:
- Codecs compress and decompress video files. Analyzing the codec information can help determine if the video has been re-encoded or altered. Authentic CCTV footage typically shows consistent codec usage and compression patterns.
Metadata Analysis:
- Metadata includes information about the video file, such as the date and time of recording, the device used, and settings. Examining metadata can reveal discrepancies, such as inconsistencies in timestamps or anomalies in the recording device information.
File Structure Examination:
- This involves analyzing the internal structure of the video file, including headers, frame data, and other components. A consistent and logical file structure suggests authenticity, while anomalies can indicate tampering.

Admissibility in Court

For CCTV video evidence to be admissible in court, the following conditions generally need to be met:

Relevance: The video must be directly related to the case and have probative value.
Authentication: There must be proof that the video is genuine and has not been tampered with. This can be established through the methods mentioned above.
Chain of Custody: A documented chain of custody must be maintained, showing who has handled the video from the time it was recorded until it is presented in court.
Expert Testimony: Often, experts in digital forensics or video analysis may be called upon to testify regarding the methods used to authenticate the video.

Ensuring Video Evidence is Not Fake

To ensure video evidence is not fake, the following steps can be taken:

Verify Hash Values: Check the hash values of the video file at various stages of handling to ensure consistency.
Analyze Digital Signatures: Confirm the digital signatures to ensure the video is from a trusted source.
Conduct ELA and Codec Analysis: Perform thorough error level and codec analyses to detect any signs of manipulation.
Examine Metadata and File Structure: Scrutinize metadata and file structure for inconsistencies or anomalies.

By employing these methods, courts can determine the authenticity of CCTV video evidence and decide its admissibility and weight in legal proceedings.

H.264 and H.265 (also known as HEVC – High-Efficiency Video Coding) are popular video compression standards widely used in video recording and transmission, including security systems like DVRs and NVRs.

When dealing with video evidence in these formats, authenticity verification involves several technical considerations:

Metadata Analysis: Both H.264 and H.265 formats embed metadata within the video file. This metadata includes timestamps, camera information, and encoding details. Analyzing this metadata can help verify the video’s origin and integrity.
Codec Analysis: Understanding the compression codecs (H.264, H.265) used is crucial. It involves examining the encoding parameters and identifying any inconsistencies or irregularities that might indicate tampering.
File Structure Examination: Analyzing the file structure for anomalies or signs of manipulation is essential. Any alterations or additions to the original file might be detected through careful examination.
Error Level Analysis: Compression and encoding processes can introduce specific artifacts or errors. Forensic analysis can detect inconsistencies or unnatural patterns that might suggest alterations or edits.
Hashing and Digital Signatures: Using cryptographic techniques like hashing or digital signatures can help establish the integrity of the video file. These techniques create unique identifiers for the file, allowing comparison to the original for any changes.
Expert Examination: Forensic experts with specialized tools and knowledge can conduct detailed analyses to detect any signs of manipulation or inconsistencies within the video file.
Verification against Source: Comparing the video evidence against the original source or other corroborating evidence can help validate its authenticity.

While H.264 and H.265 formats are widely used and can provide high-quality video recordings, their integrity can still be subject to manipulation. However, with proper forensic analysis and expert examination, it’s possible to ascertain the authenticity of video evidence stored in these formats. Courts recognize the importance of these analyses in determining the admissibility of such evidence.

1. Collection from SGCCTV Choicecycle Sim Lim Square CCTV SPECIALIST #02-81 11am~8pm. Whatsapp 98534404 for stock level before visit.